Skip to main content

Inclusion and Equity

Improving the quality of SRH services can lead to improved health outcomes, both directly and through improved patient experiences of care.1 

However, many people have long faced barriers to high-quality SRH care, including inequitable access to information; cost and insurance gaps; unnecessary, inadequate, or biased medical practices; and institutional barriers, such as lack of trained staff.6 Black, indigenous, people of color; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, and intersex (LGBTQI+) people; people living in poverty; people with disabilities; people with larger bodies; immigrants; and others with (often intersecting) marginalized identities are more likely to face the barriers described above and experience unique systemic barriers to SRH care and discrimination within and beyond the health care system.7, 8, 9, 10  These groups also have a history and continued experiences of reproductive injustices, including forced sterilizations and coercive use of contraception.11, 12

Delivery of high-quality, unbiased SRH care is one critical step in achieving sexual and reproductive health equity (SRHE).8 SRHE is defined as a state in which all people across the range of age, gender, disability, race, and other intersectional identities have what they need to attain their highest level of SRH, including the ability to self-determine and achieve their reproductive goals.1SRHE draws from human rights, health equity, and reproductive justice13 frameworks and requires policies, healthcare systems, and other structures to ensure its advancement.14 

The SRHE framework shaped the development of these recommendations, including through the incorporation of the overarching equity principles that were developed to guide this QFP update (Exhibit 2).1 These principles, detailed further in the methods section, have included the engagement of users of the QFP recommendations and users of SRH services through listening sessions, visioning sessions, and lived experience panels; the use of equity review guides and checklists; and the incorporation of various forms of evidence.

The recommendations aim to support the delivery of inclusive, person-centered care. With this goal in mind, this QFP update uses gender-inclusive language throughout and includes a wider range of methods of family building.15 

  • The term “assigned female at birth” (AFAB) is used to describe particular considerations for people who were born with and may or may not currently have a uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, vagina, and vulva without connecting this anatomy to the experience of gender identity.16 
  • Similarly, the term “assigned male at birth” (AMAB) is used for people who were born with and may or may not currently have a penis and testes without connecting this anatomy to the experience of gender identity. 
  •  Because these recommendations apply beyond the formal health care system, the terms “person,” “individual,” “client,” “user,” and “patient” are all used to refer to people who may seek or desire SRH care. 
  • Additionally, the term “clinic” is used to define broadly the various types of service sites, health centers, and clinical settings where SRH care is provided.

Exhibit 2: Overarching Equity Principles Guiding Development of QFP

  • Ground QFP in a holistic vision of SRH that centers justice, equity, and autonomy. 
  • Integrate rigorous scientific evidence to benefit the health of individuals and communities while recognizing the limitations of the current evidence base and applying an equity lens in its interpretation. 
  • Use inclusive, person-centered definitions and language, driven by diverse partner input. 
  • Prioritize inclusion throughout the development and implementation processes so QFP meets the needs of individuals and communities and does not cause unintentional harm.
  • Understand and reflect on the impact of the historical, sociocultural, political, geographical, and economic contexts that influence the lived experiences of communities and the delivery of care. 
  • Design QFP so it will expand access to quality care for all, with a particular emphasis on those most impacted by SRH inequities and injustices.
  • Design QFP so the information is easily accessible, user-friendly, and facilitates dissemination and implementation.

* Note: Developed for QFP update and approved by OPA and Expert Workgroup.

Resources for Providers

Source:
Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access
Source:
Innovating Education in Reproductive Health
  • 1

    Hart J, Crear-Perry J, Stern L. U.S. sexual and reproductive health policy: which frameworks are needed now, and next steps forward. American Journal of Public Health. 2022;112(S5):S518-S522. 

  • 1

    Hart J, Crear-Perry J, Stern L. U.S. sexual and reproductive health policy: which frameworks are needed now, and next steps forward. American Journal of Public Health. 2022;112(S5):S518-S522.

  • 1

    Hart J, Crear-Perry J, Stern L. U.S. sexual and reproductive health policy: which frameworks are needed now, and next steps forward. American Journal of Public Health. 2022;112(S5):S518-S522.

  • 6

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 615: access to contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):250-255. 

  • 7

    Gubrium AC, Mann ES, Borrero S, et al. Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American journal of public health. 2016;106(1):18. 

  • 8

    Stern AM. Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(7):1128-1138.

  • 8

    Stern AM. Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(7):1128-1138. 

  • 9

    Dehlendorf C. Should Preventing Unintended Pregnancy Be Family Planning's Holy Grail?Rewire News Group. 2018. June 19, 2018. Accessed January 31, 2024.

  • 10

    Nuriddin A, Mooney G, White AI. Reckoning with histories of medical racism and violence in the USA. The Lancet. 2020;396(10256):949-951.

  • 11

    Roberts D. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and The Meaning of Liberty. Pantheon; 1999.

  • 12

    Stern L, Sterile H, Nguyen D, Moskosky S, Hart J. What is sexual and reproductive health equity and why does it matter for nurse practitioners?Women's Healthcare. 2021. Accessed March 11, 2024. SRHE Key Terms and Frameworks

  • 13

    Sistersong. What is Reproductive Justice? Accessed March 11, 2024.

  • 14

    Stern L, Hart J, Danaux J. Conceptualizing Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity. 2021. Accessed March 11, 2024.

  • 15

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Inclusive Language: Statement of Policy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2022. Accessed January 31, 2024. 

  • 16

    National Institutes of Health. Terms and Definitions. Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Accessed April 4, 2024.